| Published: Sunday, Aug. 14, 2005
Scientists find formula for meat minus animals
By ALEX DOMINGUEZ, The Associated Press
BALTIMORE – Researchers are dishing up the perfect conundrum
for vegetarians – meat grown in a laboratory dish, not on
the hoof.
While it may be years before laboratory-raised meat hits
your store shelf, researchers say the technology exists now
to produce processed meats such as burgers and sausages, starting
with cells taken from cow, chicken, pig, fish or other animal.
Growing meat without the animal would have a number of advantages.
It would reduce the need for the animals. Meat production
is also blamed for a variety of environmental ills. And cultured
meat also could be tailored to be healthier than farm-raised
meat, while satisfying the increasing demand for protein by
the world's growing population, proponents say.
Brian J. Ford, a British biologist and the author of "The
Future of Food," said the widespread acceptance of meat
substitutes such as ‘quorn,' a cultured fungus, "shows
that the time for cultured tissue is near."
Techniques for engineering muscle cells and other tissues
were first developed for medical use. Now a handful of researchers
are looking into growing edible muscle cells, said Jason Matheny,
a University of Maryland doctoral student who co-authored
a paper on in vitro meat techniques.
Industrializing the process could involve growing muscle
cells on large sheets or beads suspended in a growth medium.
The sheet would have to be stretched, or the beads would have
to be able to expand, to stretch the cells and provide the
exercise needed for the cells to develop, he said.
"If you didn't stretch them, you would be eating mush.
It would be like pink-colored Jell-O," Matheny said.
Once the cells have grown enough, they could be scraped off
and packaged. If edible sheets or beads are used, all of it
could be eaten.
"The technology is there to produce something like a
processed meat. You could produce a heavily processed chicken
meat just like, perhaps, a nugget," Matheny said.
"The technology to produce something like a steak or
chicken breast is still quite a ways off. There's a lot of
technological challenge to producing something that has a
structure to it."
Growing a steak, for example, requires more than just muscle
cells. Blood vessels, fat and connective tissue would also
have to be grown. If too many muscle cells grow on top of
each other, for example, the cells on the inside of the muscle
mass will no longer be exposed to the nutrients in the growth
medium and will die, Matheny said.
In June, researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
said they had taken a step toward solving that problem. The
researchers, studying the creation of replacement parts for
humans, said they used a mix of cells to grow muscle tissue
that had its own blood vessels. The human tissue was implanted
into mice, where they watched blood flow into the engineered
muscle.
|
 |
Touro College bioengineer Morris Benjaminson said fish muscle
cells cultured at his laboratory for NASA passed a "sniff
panel," and he believes seafood might be the first to
be laboratory cultured.
"We actually did cook the fish meat we grew," Benjaminson
said. "It looked, according to them, and smelled like
the fish you can buy in the supermarket."
However, the panel did not eat the cultured meat, he said.
While growing meat in a dish is too expensive for anything
but space travel, Benjaminson thinks it's feasible to one
day produce a cheaper, tastier, fishless-stick.
"With a little bit of money and time, we could produce
probably something that resembles a fish filet," he said.
"There's no reason to think it wouldn't be just as flaky
as any other fish filet."
Crab, shrimp or other shellfish also could be cultured, he
said.
Dr. Vladimir Mironov, director of the Shared Tissue Engineering
Lab at the Medical University of South Carolina, envisions
a countertop device like a bread machine that could one day
produce sausage or hamburger. Instead of flour, water and
yeast, it would need muscle stem cells, a growth medium and
an edible structure for the cells to grow on, he said.
While Benjaminson's research required the fish to be killed
to get the muscle cells needed to start the process, eventually
the process could be refined to allow the use of a cultured
cell line or a biopsy so the donor fish could live, he said.
While many growth mediums are animal based, Benjaminson said
he has also developed a mushroom-based growth medium. Researchers
at South Dakota State University have also developed an animal-free
medium, Matheny said.
If a product is brought to market, Matheny admits he isn't
sure how consumers would react.
"In some ways, this is a product of biotechnology in
the same way bread and wine and cheese are products of biotechnology,"
Matheny said. "You take something that's found in nature
and reproduce it in a controlled environment."
Ford said many are already turned off by meat because of
the miserable lives many animals suffer. Cultured meat could
appeal to those consumers, but it isn't likely to appear in
stores soon.
"People will take time to get used to the idea, and
it will be a slow process of adaptation," Ford said.
Pitfalls include viruses that could infect meat cultures,
he said. If the idea is rushed to market before it's shown
to be safe, the public will be turned against the concept.
"That's what has already happened with genetically modified
crops," Ford said. "The idea of cultured meat has
great appeal to me, but we must move cautiously."
|